Morning Bus Ride Reflections

April 28, 2015 It was a beautiful day in Columbus, Ohio. This morning I had a meeting on the far north side of the city at The Continent Columbus (1-61 and Busch Blvd.) which is basically the last stop on the #8 Hamilton Ave bus. It's about an hour ride and a great time just to sit relax, observe and appreciate the diversity of Columbus. Here a few things that I saw, felt and experienced during the hour long ride.

Morning #8 COTA Bus Ride

Children going to school.

Black woman walking slowly using a walker boards the bus.

Kneeling bus.

More restaurants in the Short North.

Gateway, Ohio State, borderlands.

A car on left lane swerves in front of bus to turn right. Crazy!

Bike rider mounting his bike on the bike rack.

Gentrification.

Reflection time.

Asian woman with four bags.

Reading the morning news on my phone with a low battery.

Forgot my charger.

Blue sky outside.

Lifeless Ohio State Fairgrounds.

Sitting in silence with lots of thinking happening.

Corner stores.

Trying to stop thinking and just be.

I smile when I see a taco truck: Texano Taquerilla.

Cooks IGA.

A Somali rider says hello.

Morse Road car madness.

Bedroom Community.

Split level homes.

Latina woman greets me with a voiceless hello.

1-61 Dublin-Granville Road car madness.

I get to my destination.

Get off and thank the bus operator.

No pedestrian sidewalks.

Off to my meeting.

Pay to Play or Leave the Room

I attended the Stonewall Democrats of Central Ohio (SDCO) meeting on April 7th in support of Columbus City Council candidate Will Petrik. I learned that the SDCO had recommended Petrik to be endorsed for Columbus City Council. I was impressed with this bold move. I had only been to one of their meetings before about 10 years ago or so. I remember leaving that meeting on my own as I was definitely one of the few People of Color in the room and there were very few women in attendance. I felt like an outsider. This time, I was excited about attending and anticipated some real progress with this organization.

This excitement started to fade quickly as I walked into the small packed of mostly white (still) attendees and likely coming from the same social and economic demographic. Most people were friendly but many, including candidates, didn't even say hello. In my culture as I know it, a "saludo" (greeting/hello) is a must regardless of anything. There seemed to be many Andrew Ginther for Mayor supporters in attendance and it felt as though I was at a Ginther rally or meeting. It was obvious they had stacked the room, which is fair play in politics I suppose.

What I didn't realize was that a large number of Ginther supporters had become members in order to sway and change the endorsements.

Much has been said about the Ginther/Scott dual endorsement process at the meeting, but I am equally concerned about the process for replacing Will Petrik with Jaiza Page. Petrik was on the Stonewall Democrat's recommended slate for endorsement.

All candidates present spoke during the gathering. The Franklin County Democratic Party candidates stuck to their talking points regarding the "slate" of endorsed candidates. None spoke of their big vision for Columbus. Will Petrik was the only candidate who spoke of the need to listen to the community and his support for public transportation, universal pre-K, quality education in our schools and raising the minimum wage in Columbus. I wish I could have taken a picture capturing the collective look of the "members" when he spoke of these issues. It was the look of: "what does that have to do with us?" It was the look of a group of "Stonewall" members who no longer remember their history and are now insiders embedded in politics as usual and not the community.

After the candidates spoke, they were asked to leave the room and Stonewall members began the conversation about which candidates to endorse. It was clear that there was a deliberate strategy to replace Will Petrik as the endorsed candidate. I then realized that the Ginther camp was likley behind this strategy. They bought memberships and packed the room to sway the process. When Petrik supporters spoke up, we were asked if we were SDCO members. When we acknowledged that we were not, we were asked to leave the room which was shocking to me. No one else was questioned about their membership.

As I reflect on this whole experience, I am reminded of the history of Stonewall. It was an organic movement that emerged from an "uprising". This movement was largely about a group of people who were not welcome in, or could not afford other places of gay social gathering. There were hundreds of young "homosexuals" who literally had no home, came to New York without jobs, money, influence or contacts. Many had skills enough to get a job but didn't fall in with people who could help them. They were outsiders in the community at large and even within their own community. This is what Stonewall means to me as an organizer for justice issues. What I witnessed happen at this meeting, was not what I understand the Stonewall movement to be.

The well funded corporate political campaign of Andrew Ginther once again found a way to influence and change the decision within an organization. With their political motives and support, they found a way to exclude this Queer Latinx, my partner, and others. More importantly it denounced the good work of the Stonewall Democrats screening committee, and in essence said they don't matter either. This alone should send a wake up call abot the integrity of the Andrew Ginther campaign. If they are so sure of themselves, why would they have to sway this process? The meeting and the process on April 7th once again told me that I'm an outsider and don't matter.

I am aware that there are always good people with integrity caught in these systems. Many of whom reached out to tell their story. They fear going against the Democratic Party because they are employed by it or do not want to be rejected by their peers. It is a sad reality coming from the progressive camp.

As for me, I will continue to speak out for the outsider. I will also vote on May 5th.

Organizing from the Ground-Up

The Unmentioned Organizing Moments of 2013

I recently came across this article titled "The 13 Best Organizing Moments of 2013” compiled by the New Organizing Institute which was shared by friends of mine in (for lack of better wording) “progressive” circles citing it as a good roundup of this year’s best organizing moments.  2013 was certainly a year to remember for organizing, do not get me wrong.  The moments highlighted in this article were definitely worth remembering and two of them were related to the push for Immigration Reform (United We Dream’s “Operation Butterfly” and the ongoing “Fast For Families”) and rightly so--the struggle for fair and comprehensive immigration reform is ongoing as the bill currently sits in the House.  

Member of DreamActivist Ohio welcoming 2 of the #Dream30 back to Columbus

What I found revealing, however, was what this article chose not to include.  In the same year, two waves of fearless undocumented immigrants--first the “Dream 9” followed by the “Dream 30”-- crossed the border in an effort to reunite families and publicize the gravity of record high deportations under the Obama Administration.  Meanwhile, undocumented immigrants and allies have held numerous acts of civil disobedience, literally stopping ICE trucks by blocking access roads and putting their own lives on the line.  

Members of Undocumented Illinois blocking an ICE truck in Chicago

It seems odd that we celebrate a years worth of organizing while ignoring these acts of bravery.  It feels like many are still stuck in this paradigm that we can do certain things to highlight an unjust system (such as fasting) but when it comes to directly defying the system, suddenly there seems to be a lack of coverage. History has showed us that it take these brave acts of defiance to make change, it's simply unfortunate that the mainstream media and seemingly "progressive" non-profit organizations choose to ignore them.

Columbus City Council Passes Resolution Supporting "Securing our National Borders"

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUMBUS: That this Council urges the United States Congress to adopt and enact comprehensive immigration reform that would help secure our international borders and provide a path to citizenship for the nearly eleven million undocumented immigrants who live in the United States today.

On June 24, 2013, the Columbus City Council unanimously passed the above resolution. It is my understanding that the resolution came from the Mayor’s office. I also believe that it comes with somewhat good intentions. But that’s where I stop in terms of fully supporting the resolution. I support immigration reform and have been working on this for many years. But immigration reform is only part of our fight for justice.

I did not fully support this resolution because of the following inclusion: The Columbus Council urges Congress to support immigration reform that “would help secure our international borders…”

As City council was considering this resolution, the United States Senate was voting on the Republican introduced Hoeven-Corker amendment to invoke cloture that would add 20,000 border agents with significant increases in funding for agents, technologies and fencing. It would add 20,00 border agents at the potential cost of about $30 billion and would require 700 miles of double-layered fencing along the U.S.-Mexican border. It also requires Congress to appropriate money for radar surveillance on the border similar to what is being used in Iraq and Afghanistan. Further, undocumented immigrants could not gain green cards until a 10-year period has passed and the border requirements have been met. The amendment passed 67-27.

The inclusion of this amendment in the Senate immigration bill has caused much conversation on how national immigrant/migrant rights groups feel about the Gang of Eight Senate bill. Many are thinking that the proposed immigration reform legislation has gone too far with border security. In fact PRESENTE.org, the nation’s largest online Latino advocacy organization came out against the present bill only minutes after Columbus Council’s vote.

At least once a week, I receive calls from the immigrant community specifically about ICE picking up or detaining someone from the Columbus community. Families are separated every day in Columbus. All in the name of border enforcement and securing the border. As I shared this with the council and looked directly in their eyes, I felt the council members either did not know about this or refused to acknowledge it. They had no questions for me.

I hope Columbus City Council understands that passing such a resolution is more than patting themselves on the back or complying with some partisan mandate that came from above or even just looking good as a great city. It’s about what is in the body of their resolution;

- Recognizing the economic, social and cultural contributions immigrants bring to their communities and, in particular, to Columbus, Ohio;

- The responsibility of municipal leaders to protect the well-being and safety of all people residing in their cities;

- The duty of local leaders to respect the rights of, and provide equal services to, all individuals, regardless of national origin or immigration status;

- That family unity as a component of a strong, healthy community and economy, and re-unification of families has been a key part of federal immigration policy for almost fifty years.

I remain steadfast in my words as I accepted a very similar resolution on that same podium offered by the leadership of then council member Chareta Tavares on June 21, 2010: "I think when we get to the core of who we are, people understand it's about human rights. Who can argue with human rights?" Do you agree 2013 Columbus Council members?

It's never easy but someone has to stand up to the system and tell the full story. I am honored and humbled to have done so in this case. #HastaLaVictoriaSiempre